Peoria produces a kind of bicycle claim the inner Valley does not. Long arterials with 45 mph limits, narrow or absent shoulders north of Happy Valley, and the recreational corridors toward Lake Pleasant put riders alongside traffic moving far faster than they are. The insurer’s opening argument is then almost always the same: you were where you should not have been, or you were holding up traffic. A Peoria bicycle accident lawyer starts by answering both with statute.
Yes, and the statute covers the shoulder as well as the lane. A.R.S. § 28-812 grants a person riding a bicycle on a roadway or on a shoulder adjoining a roadway all of the rights and all of the duties that apply to the driver of a vehicle.
That matters on Lake Pleasant Parkway and the northern stretches of 83rd and 99th Avenue, where a rideable shoulder appears and disappears. A cyclist on the shoulder is a road user with the same right of way as the car passing them, not a trespasser tolerated at the edge.
The corollary is equally useful: nothing requires you to use the shoulder. A.R.S. § 28-815 requires riding as close as practicable to the right only when traveling at less than the normal speed of traffic, and even then lists four exceptions passing, preparing for a left turn, avoiding hazards including surface conditions and parked vehicles, and a lane too narrow to share safely. On a broken shoulder, moving into the lane is the statute working as intended.
They can argue it, but the statute they usually mean does not apply to you. This is the most common accusation in a Peoria road-cycling claim, and it rests on a misreading.
A.R.S. § 28-704(A) prohibits driving a motor vehicle at a speed so slow as to impede or block the normal and reasonable movement of traffic. A bicycle is not a motor vehicle under Arizona’s definitions, so that prohibition is not written to reach a cyclist.
Subsection C is narrower still. It requires a person driving a vehicle at less than the normal flow of traffic to turn off at a designated turnout but only on a two-lane highway where passing is unsafe, and only where five or more vehicles have queued behind. Whether it reaches bicycles at all is unsettled, and most Peoria arterials are multi-lane roads where passing is safe, which puts them outside the provision regardless.
So when an adjuster asserts you were unlawfully impeding traffic, the response is a question: under which statute, and does it apply to a bicycle?
Yes, on a roadway. A.R.S. § 28-815(B) permits persons riding bicycles on a roadway to ride no more than two abreast; the restriction is on riding three or more side by side, not on riding in pairs. Only on paths set aside for the exclusive use of bicycles does the limitation tighten.
That matters for the group rides using Lake Pleasant Parkway and the north Peoria loops on weekend mornings. A pair riding side by side in a travel lane is complying with the statute, and a driver treating that as provocation has misunderstood the rule.
No closer than three feet. A.R.S. § 28-735 requires a driver overtaking a bicycle traveling in the same direction to leave a safe distance of not less than three feet until safely past, with civil penalties that increase where the violation causes serious physical injury and increase again where it causes death.
There is a limitation worth knowing before an adjuster raises it: the penalty provision does not apply where a designated bicycle lane or path was present and passable. On Peoria’s outer arterials and recreational corridors no such lane exists so on exactly the roads where a three-foot violation is most dangerous, the carve-out does not help the driver. That violation is direct evidence of a breach rather than opinion, which makes lane-width measurements worth documenting immediately.
Lights yes, helmet no. Arizona has no statewide helmet requirement at any age. Some municipalities impose local rules for riders under 18, but riding without one violates no state law and cannot reduce the driver’s share of fault.
A.R.S. § 28-817 is stricter than most riders assume. A bicycle used at night must carry a white front lamp visible at least 500 feet and a department-approved red rear reflector visible from 50 to 300 feet. A red rear lamp is permitted in addition to the reflector, not as a substitute so a blinking taillight with no reflector may not satisfy the statute. The same section requires a brake capable of skidding the braked wheels.
Two smaller points recur in fault disputes. A cyclist may signal a right turn with the right arm extended, which differs from the driver convention and is sometimes mischaracterized as a failure to signal. And under A.R.S. § 28-811 a parent or guardian may not authorize or knowingly permit a child to violate the bicycle article.
Often your own auto policy, even though you were on a bicycle. Uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage generally follows the person rather than the vehicle, so a rider struck by an uninsured or fleeing driver may have a claim under their own policy, and sometimes a resident family member’s. Insurers must offer it under A.R.S. § 20-259.01, though buying it is optional, so your declarations page is the first document to pull.
Coverage is often the real ceiling anyway. A.R.S. § 28-4009 sets Arizona’s minimums at $25,000 per person and $50,000 per accident, which one orthopedic surgery can exhaust.
Peoria Municipal Court hears no civil injury suits. Claims above $10,000 go to Maricopa County Superior Court, smaller matters to a Maricopa County justice court civil suit to $10,000, small claims to $3,500.
Arizona applies pure comparative negligence under A.R.S. § 12-2505, so an award is reduced by your assigned share of the fault with no cutoff which is why every argument above is really an argument about percentage points. The filing deadline is generally two years under A.R.S. § 12-542, with minors’ claims tolled until eighteen under A.R.S. § 12-502. Where a public entity may share responsibility a roadway defect, a signal failure, a shoulder drop-off notice is generally due within 180 days under A.R.S. § 12-821.01, then one year to file.
We proudly support and represent cyclists throughout the Peoria area, including locations near:
Rio Vista Park
Pioneer Community Park
New River Trail
Peoria Sports Complex
Deer Valley
Old Town Peoria
We also collaborate with or recommend complementary Peoria-area partners when appropriate, including:
Medical providers offering injury rehabilitation
Bicycle repair shops
Local safety organizations promoting cyclist safety
Community riding groups and clubs
Jason A. Harris has practiced personal injury and workers’ compensation law in Arizona since 2006, representing thousands of injury clients. Clients speak with him directly rather than a case manager.
Cases run on a contingency fee, no retainer, no hourly billing, no attorney fee unless compensation is recovered. Case costs, including reconstruction, are advanced and reimbursed from any recovery, with terms in writing before you sign. Consultations are free.
Because a rider takes the impact directly, these files run toward the long tail of a brain injury and lifetime care costs after a spinal injury. Where a rider does not survive, only the beneficiaries listed in A.R.S. § 12-612 may bring a wrongful death action. A bicycle accident attorney in Peoria also handles the car accident and pedestrian claims arising from the same corridors, alongside our Peoria personal injury practice.
No. A.R.S. § 28-812 grants cyclists full rights on a roadway or an adjoining shoulder, and A.R.S. § 28-815 requires riding as close as practicable to the right only when traveling slower than the normal speed of traffic with exceptions for passing, left turns, avoiding hazards, and lanes too narrow to share safely. Using a shoulder or bike lane is not mandatory.
They can say it, but A.R.S. § 28-704(A) prohibits impeding traffic in a motor vehicle, and a bicycle is not a motor vehicle under Arizona’s definitions. Subsection C’s turnout requirement applies only on a two-lane highway where passing is unsafe with five or more vehicles queued behind, and whether it reaches bicycles at all is unsettled.
A department-approved red rear reflector visible from 50 to 300 feet is what A.R.S. § 28-817 requires, along with a white front lamp visible at least 500 feet. A red rear lamp is permitted in addition to the reflector rather than instead of it, so a blinking taillight alone may not comply.
Arizona has no statewide helmet requirement at any age, so riding without one violates no state law and cannot make the driver less at fault. An insurer may still raise it as a damages argument, but it has no bearing on losses a helmet would not have prevented.
Lane width measurements, camera footage, and the bicycle itself before repair are what settle these claims and frame and wheel damage establish impact direction and speed long after memories blur.
Harris Injury Law, PLLC 1136 E Campbell Ave, Phoenix, AZ 85014 (480) 800-4878
A bicycle accident lawyer, Peoria riders reach directly, serving the West Valley and Maricopa County. Request a free consultation or meet our attorneys. Every case depends on its own facts; no outcome can be promised or predicted.
This page provides general information about Arizona law and is not legal advice. Reading it creates no attorney-client relationship. Arizona law and local ordinances change. Consult a licensed Arizona attorney about your situation.
Reviewed by Jason A. Harris, Harris Injury Law, PLLC.
to assist you with your Bicycle accident case.
Call or text now for a free consultation.
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
"After my bicycle accident on Deer Valley Road, I didn’t know where to start. Harris Injury Law explained the legal process clearly and helped me get medical care right away. I always spoke directly with Jason, and he made sure the insurance company didn’t take advantage of me. I’m so grateful for the outcome."
- R.S., Peoria, AZ
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
"My husband was injured in a bicycle crash near Rio Vista Park. We were worried about medical bills and lost wages. Jason Harris helped us understand our rights and the steps we needed to take. We truly felt supported throughout the entire process."
-M.L., Peoria, AZ
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
"Jason Harris and the team were professional, communicative, and supportive throughout our bicycle accident claim. The team was easy to reach, answered all our questions, and guided us when my son suffered head injuries in a bike accident. They provided peace of mind during a stressful time."
- T.J., Peoria, AZ
Located at 1136 E Campbell Ave, Phoenix, AZ 85014. Harris Injury Law, PLLC specializes in auto and truck accidents and workers’ compensation. Speak directly with your lawyer from the beginning. Same-day and emergency consultations are available. You never pay out of pocket. Call us at any time – 24/7.
Harris Injury Law
We firmly believe that the internet should be available and accessible to anyone, and are committed to providing a website that is accessible to the widest possible audience, regardless of circumstance and ability.
To fulfill this, we aim to adhere as strictly as possible to the World Wide Web Consortium’s (W3C) Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.1 (WCAG 2.1) at the AA level. These guidelines explain how to make web content accessible to people with a wide array of disabilities. Complying with those guidelines helps us ensure that the website is accessible to all people: blind people, people with motor impairments, visual impairment, cognitive disabilities, and more.
This website utilizes various technologies that are meant to make it as accessible as possible at all times. We utilize an accessibility interface that allows persons with specific disabilities to adjust the website’s UI (user interface) and design it to their personal needs.
Additionally, the website utilizes an AI-based application that runs in the background and optimizes its accessibility level constantly. This application remediates the website’s HTML, adapts Its functionality and behavior for screen-readers used by the blind users, and for keyboard functions used by individuals with motor impairments.
If you’ve found a malfunction or have ideas for improvement, we’ll be happy to hear from you. You can reach out to the website’s operators by using the following email
Our website implements the ARIA attributes (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) technique, alongside various different behavioral changes, to ensure blind users visiting with screen-readers are able to read, comprehend, and enjoy the website’s functions. As soon as a user with a screen-reader enters your site, they immediately receive a prompt to enter the Screen-Reader Profile so they can browse and operate your site effectively. Here’s how our website covers some of the most important screen-reader requirements, alongside console screenshots of code examples:
Screen-reader optimization: we run a background process that learns the website’s components from top to bottom, to ensure ongoing compliance even when updating the website. In this process, we provide screen-readers with meaningful data using the ARIA set of attributes. For example, we provide accurate form labels; descriptions for actionable icons (social media icons, search icons, cart icons, etc.); validation guidance for form inputs; element roles such as buttons, menus, modal dialogues (popups), and others. Additionally, the background process scans all the website’s images and provides an accurate and meaningful image-object-recognition-based description as an ALT (alternate text) tag for images that are not described. It will also extract texts that are embedded within the image, using an OCR (optical character recognition) technology. To turn on screen-reader adjustments at any time, users need only to press the Alt+1 keyboard combination. Screen-reader users also get automatic announcements to turn the Screen-reader mode on as soon as they enter the website.
These adjustments are compatible with all popular screen readers, including JAWS and NVDA.
Keyboard navigation optimization: The background process also adjusts the website’s HTML, and adds various behaviors using JavaScript code to make the website operable by the keyboard. This includes the ability to navigate the website using the Tab and Shift+Tab keys, operate dropdowns with the arrow keys, close them with Esc, trigger buttons and links using the Enter key, navigate between radio and checkbox elements using the arrow keys, and fill them in with the Spacebar or Enter key.Additionally, keyboard users will find quick-navigation and content-skip menus, available at any time by clicking Alt+1, or as the first elements of the site while navigating with the keyboard. The background process also handles triggered popups by moving the keyboard focus towards them as soon as they appear, and not allow the focus drift outside it.
Users can also use shortcuts such as “M” (menus), “H” (headings), “F” (forms), “B” (buttons), and “G” (graphics) to jump to specific elements.
We aim to support the widest array of browsers and assistive technologies as possible, so our users can choose the best fitting tools for them, with as few limitations as possible. Therefore, we have worked very hard to be able to support all major systems that comprise over 95% of the user market share including Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, Apple Safari, Opera and Microsoft Edge, JAWS and NVDA (screen readers).
Despite our very best efforts to allow anybody to adjust the website to their needs. There may still be pages or sections that are not fully accessible, are in the process of becoming accessible, or are lacking an adequate technological solution to make them accessible. Still, we are continually improving our accessibility, adding, updating and improving its options and features, and developing and adopting new technologies. All this is meant to reach the optimal level of accessibility, following technological advancements. For any assistance, please reach out to