Skip to content If you’ve been injured in a distracted driving accident in Tempe, AZ, you don’t have to face the legal process alone. Harris Injury Law brings more than 16 years of experience handling complex auto accident cases, including those caused by distracted or negligent drivers. Our dedicated team of Tempe personal injury lawyers provides compassionate guidance, thorough investigation, and strong advocacy to help car accident victims pursue compensation under Arizona law.
Almost everyone assumes that if the other driver got a phone ticket, the case is over. In Arizona it is not and the reason is a statute most people have never heard of. Distraction claims are won with phone records, vehicle data, and app logs, not with the citation. Below is what Arizona actually prohibits, why the ticket does less than you think, and what evidence a Tempe distracted driving accident lawyer goes after first.
Holding the phone at all, not just texting. Under A.R.S. § 28-914, a driver may not operate a vehicle on a street or highway while physically holding or supporting a portable wireless communication device with any part of the body, and may not write, send, or read any text-based communication.
The permitted uses are narrower than most drivers believe:
Hands-free is allowed, including a device accessible through an interface embedded in the vehicle but only hand contact to activate or deactivate a function.
An earpiece, headphone, or wrist-worn device may be used for voice-based communication.
A parked vehicle, or one stopped at a red signal, falls outside the prohibition. This carve-out is real, and it is one insurers raise: a driver scrolling at the light on Rural Road and University Drive was not violating the statute at that moment.
The statute also carves out operators of authorized emergency, law enforcement, and probation vehicles acting officially, FCC-licensed operators of certain radio frequency devices, and two-way or private land mobile radio use within the scope of the operator’s work.
Enforcement is primary, meaning an officer can stop a driver for this alone. A first violation carries a civil penalty of $75 to $149, and a second or subsequent violation $150 to $250.
Because Arizona law says a paid citation is not evidence of negligence. Under A.R.S. § 28-1599, an admission of the allegations in a civil traffic complaint, or a judgment on that complaint, is not evidence of negligence in a civil proceeding.
This surprises people, and it cuts both ways. If the at-fault driver quietly paid a hands-free citation, that payment does not establish liability in your injury claim. And if you were cited for something, your payment cannot be used against you either.
What it means practically is that the distraction has to be proven independently. That is the actual work of a distracted driving case, and it is why these claims reward moving early. Most of the proof sits in records that age out or get overwritten.
Data, not testimony. No driver admits to looking at a screen. These are the sources that settle it:
Cell phone records, obtained through the claim or by subpoena in litigation, showing call, text, and data activity against the collision timestamp
The vehicle’s event data recorder the “black box” capturing pre-impact speed, braking, throttle, and steering inputs. The absence of braking before impact is powerful circumstantial proof that a driver never saw what was ahead.
Infotainment and telematics data, which on many vehicles logs paired devices, calls, and screen interaction
Rideshare and delivery app logs, which timestamp acceptance, navigation, and message activity
Independent witnesses and nearby camera footage, including business, doorbell, and transit platform cameras
Two of those disappear on their own. Private camera systems commonly overwrite within days, and a vehicle released to salvage takes its event data recorder with it. A written preservation demand sent early is often what keeps a case provable, and it is one of the clearest reasons not to wait.
The evidence is better, and there is usually more insurance behind it. Tempe’s density around ASU, Mill Avenue, and Apache Boulevard supports heavy rideshare and food delivery volume, and those drivers interact with a screen as a condition of the job.
That produces app records a private driver’s phone does not: trip acceptance times, navigation reroutes, and in-app messaging, all timestamped. It also opens tiered commercial coverage under A.R.S. § 28-4038, which steps up based on the driver’s app status and reaches far above Arizona’s minimum limits when a passenger is aboard. See our Tempe Uber and Lyft and delivery driver pages.
Commercial drivers are held to a stricter standard still. Federal rules prohibit handheld mobile phone use and texting by commercial motor vehicle drivers, and a carrier’s own policies and logs become discoverable relevant in truck collision claims along the US 60 and Loop 101 corridors.
Sometimes, but Arizona sets a high bar. Punitive damages require conduct beyond ordinary negligence, a conscious disregard for a substantial risk of harm to others. Ordinary inattention does not reach it.
What can move the analysis is a pattern: extended texting through a school zone, video streaming while driving, or a documented history of the same conduct. Whether the standard is met depends entirely on the evidence developed, which again returns to records rather than the citation.
Arizona applies pure comparative fault under A.R.S. § 12-2505, so an award is reduced by your assigned share with no percentage cutoff. Even a claimant found 70% responsible may recover 30% of proven damages.
Expect the insurer to look for a share to assign you that you stopped short, that you were in a blind spot, that you were distracted too. In a rear-end collision the presumption favors you but is not automatic. For pedestrians and cyclists struck along Rural Road or Apache Boulevard, the argument shifts to crossing behavior and lane position. See Arizona comparative negligence laws.
A.R.S. § 28-4009 sets Arizona’s minimum liability limits at $25,000 per person and $50,000 per accident, which a single surgery can exhaust. Your own underinsured and uninsured motorist coverage often becomes the practical source of recovery insurers must offer it under A.R.S. § 20-259.01, but buying it is optional, so check your declarations page. See how uninsured motorist coverage works.
Where injuries are severe, the questions turn to future care and earning capacity the territory of traumatic brain injury claims and, in fatal collisions, wrongful death actions.
Generally two years under A.R.S. § 12-542, running from the date of injury. Claims for injured minors are generally tolled until age eighteen under A.R.S. § 12-502. If a public entity may share responsibility for a city vehicle, Valley Metro, or a roadway defect, a notice of claim is generally due within 180 days under A.R.S. § 12-821.01, with suit filed within one year. See the statute of limitations in Arizona.
Is it illegal to hold your phone at a red light in Arizona? No. A.R.S. § 28-914 applies to operating a vehicle, and a vehicle that is parked or stopped at a red traffic signal falls outside the prohibition. That carve-out matters in a claim, because a driver who was scrolling at a light was not violating the statute at that moment the distraction still has to be tied to the collision itself.
If the other driver got a texting ticket, does that prove they were at fault? Not on its own. Under A.R.S. § 28-1599, an admission of a civil traffic complaint or a judgment on it is not evidence of negligence in a civil proceeding. Distraction has to be proven independently through phone records, vehicle event data, app logs, witnesses, or video.
How do you get the other driver’s phone records after a Tempe crash? Not by asking. Carriers do not release subscriber records to a third party voluntarily, so the usual routes are a subpoena once suit is filed or production through the claim. Because records and vehicle data are retained for limited periods, a written preservation demand sent early is often what keeps them available.
What is a black box and does my car have one? An event data recorder logs a few seconds of pre-crash information such as speed, braking, throttle, and steering. Most modern passenger vehicles have one. It is frequently the strongest evidence in a distraction case, because a complete absence of braking before impact suggests the driver never perceived the hazard but the data leaves with the vehicle once it goes to salvage.
What is the fine for using a phone while driving in Arizona? A first violation of A.R.S. § 28-914 carries a civil penalty of $75 to $149, and a second or subsequent violation carries $150 to $250. Enforcement is primary, meaning an officer may stop a driver for this alone. These are traffic penalties and are separate from any civil injury claim.
Does a distracted driving claim work differently if an Uber, Lyft, or delivery driver hit me? Usually in your favor on evidence. App activity is timestamped and creates a record a private driver’s phone does not. Tiered commercial coverage under A.R.S. § 28-4038 may also apply based on the driver’s app status, with limits well above Arizona’s minimums.
Phone records, event data, and camera footage all have expiration dates that have nothing to do with the two-year filing deadline. The evidence that proves distraction is usually gone long before the statute runs.
Harris Injury Law, PLLC 1136 E Campbell Ave, Phoenix, AZ 85014 (480) 800-HURT
Serving Tempe and the Phoenix metro. Cases are handled on a contingency fee, meaning no attorney fee unless compensation is recovered see what a personal injury lawyer costs in Arizona. Request a free consultation or read more about our Tempe car accident and Tempe personal injury practice. Every case is different and depends on its own facts; no outcome can be promised or predicted.
This page provides general information about Arizona law and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Arizona law changes, and outcomes depend on the specific facts of a claim. Consult a licensed Arizona attorney about your situation.
Reviewed by Jason A. Harris, Harris Injury Law, PLLC.
to assist you with your distracted driving accident case.
Call or text now for a free consultation.
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
“After my car accident in Tempe, I didn’t know where to turn. The team at Harris Injury Law guided me through the legal process, collected all my medical records, and dealt with the insurance adjuster who tried to minimize my claim. Jason Harris fought for a fair settlement that covered my medical expenses and lost wages.”
- S.M., Tempe, AZ
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
“A distracted driver ran a red light near Arizona State University and caused a serious crash. I sustained spinal cord injuries and emotional trauma. Jason Harris and his staff were professional and responsive in helping me seek compensation for my medical bills and property damage.”
- Tempe, AZ
These reviews reflect Harris Injury Law’s dedication to providing high-quality legal services and personalized attention to every accident victim in Tempe.
Past results do not guarantee similar outcomes. Each case is unique and must be evaluated on its own merits.
Located at 1136 E Campbell Ave, Phoenix, AZ 85014. Harris Injury Law, PLLC specializes in auto and truck accidents and workers’ compensation. Speak directly with your lawyer from the beginning. Same-day and emergency consultations are available. You never pay out of pocket. Call us at any time – 24/7.
Optimized by Seraphinite Accelerator